PP-T2-Q12

[aqboy[origen]]

12.

Situation: For five years the Souper restaurant chain has maintained rapid sales growth in Danport, primarily by opening new restaurants that draw patrons away from other restaurants in their vicinity.

Goal: Souper wishes to achieve continued rapid sales growth in Danport over the next two years.

Proposal for consideration: Continue to open new restaurants in Danport during the next two years at the same rate as in the last two years.

In light of the situation, which of the following, if true, most strongly argues that adopting the proposal would be an ineffective way of achieving the goal?

(A) At times at which customers find Souper restaurants too crowded, they often go to other restaurants nearby.
(B) The Souper chain has generally opened new restaurants in locations that are in the vicinity of a large number of other restaurants.
(C) Souper restaurants generally offer a much smaller variety of foods than many of the other restaurants in their vicinity.
(D) Virtually all potential sites for new Souper restaurants in Danport are located in the vicinity of existing Souper restaurants.
(E) Souper restaurants have always offered meals that are somewhat less expensive than meals at restaurants that compete with Souper for patrons.

ANS:D

請問b選項為甚麼不行?? 感謝~~

[Huang Hsin-Yi]

結論：未來這兩年繼續展店和過去兩年一樣,就可增加業績
題目：下列那個選項說明這個計劃不會成功?

(B)Souper Chain持續在鄰近大型餐廳展店............................................平行資訊,沒回答題目問的

[yoyopai]

The question dosn't discuss about the competitors, so the discussion in (B) is irrevelent.

[aqboy[origen]]

我覺得B選項的的意思是

(B) The Souper chain has generally opened new restaurants in locations that are in the vicinity of a large number of other restaurants

souper chain已經在其他餐廳的鄰近地區開餐廳了,

表示如果繼續在同樣地鄰近地區開餐廳的話

（題目所描述的方法）==>by opening new restaurants that draw patrons away from other restaurants in their vicinity.

就不是effective way of cheiving the goal. 這樣應該也有否定吧

是我的翻譯理解錯了嗎？？？

[Huang Hsin-Yi]

我覺得B選項的的意思是

(B) The Souper chain has generally opened new restaurants in locations that are in the vicinity of a large number of other restaurants

souper chain已經在其他餐廳的鄰近地區開餐廳了,

表示如果繼續在同樣地鄰近地區開餐廳的話
（題目所描述的方法）==>by opening new restaurants that draw patrons away from other restaurants in their vicinity. 就

我覺得上述兩段話,是一樣意思耶,因此會是support plan,不會weaken喔

不是effective way of cheiving the goal. 這樣應該也有否定吧

是我的翻譯理解錯了嗎？？？

[redeyes[origen]]

那請問A要怎麼排除呢?
覺得Souper開太多間了就會轉而選擇其他餐廳, 不也是反駁proposal嗎?