OG#132 (10th)

[candrow]

132. According to a study by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, companies in the United States are providing job training and general education for nearly eight million people, about equivalent to the enrollment of the nation’s four-year colleges and universities.
(A) equivalent to the enrollment of
(B) the equivalent of those enrolled in
(C) equal to those who are enrolled in
(D) as many as the enrollment of
(E) as many as are enrolled in

請教一下這句
文法怎麼看怎麼怪...

天馬行空的想法中有一個可能---
如果原句是...eight million people, the people who enrolled in the nation's four-year colleges...are about as many as eight million people
難道是把逗點後倒裝成:
...eight million people, about as many as are the people who enrolled in the nation’s four-year colleges...
然後再把the people who去掉???

抱歉我很像在亂講
可是我想不到有什麼可以解釋:
1. about怎麼可以接子句
2. are enrolled是什麼東西...不太可能是倒裝句吧? 人自己去enroll就好不用被動吧???那如果是are 那些enrolled的人, 中間的主詞跑哪去了...

感謝大家

ETS解釋:
The phrases equivalent to in A, the equivalent of in B, and equal to in C have too broad a range of meanings to be used precisely here: that is, they can suggest more than merely numerical equality. Also, as quantitative expressions, equivalent and equal often modify nouns referring to uncountable things, as in “an equivalent amount of resistance” or “a volume of water equal to Lake Michigan.” To establish numerical comparability between groups with countable members, the phrase as many as is preferable. Choice D, however, uses this phrase improperly in comparing eight million people to enrollment, not to other people. The comparison in E, the best choice, is logical because people is understood as the subject of are enrolled.

[chvenson]

這一題討論匯總也有哦 請參考
http://www.chemy.idv.tw/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=4778

順便提醒你一下
看你問了很多OG10的問題 這些討論匯總都有
你應該先找那邊比較好 也比較快啦
這個部份板規裡有規定哦...
好意提醒 請別見怪

[candrow]

這一題討論匯總也有哦 請參考
http://www.chemy.idv.tw/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=4778

順便提醒你一下
看你問了很多OG10的問題 這些討論匯總都有
你應該先找那邊比較好 也比較快啦
這個部份板規裡有規定哦...
好意提醒 請別見怪

非常感謝您
不過...人家是都看完才來問的啦 =.=

以前的討論模模糊糊,
結局根本沒有定論

有人說as=people
我總覺得不太可能
as many as不是本來就是一個連用功能嗎
那哪有成員還能去當pron.

還是說
OG10th的題目就只能窩在OG10th裡頭討論呢
我都是有看過之前的討論才來的

[scujean]

再插一各題外話，candrow同學你的題目要畫線的地方，都弄成黑粗體了啦..要按 u 這各鍵

[candrow]

再插一各題外話，candrow同學你的題目要畫線的地方，都弄成黑粗體了啦..要按 u 這各鍵

已經改了
非常感謝...:)

[林小馬]

這一題討論匯總也有哦 請參考
http://www.chemy.idv.tw/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=4778

順便提醒你一下
看你問了很多OG10的問題 這些討論匯總都有
你應該先找那邊比較好 也比較快啦
這個部份板規裡有規定哦...
好意提醒 請別見怪

非常感謝您
不過...人家是都看完才來問的啦 =.=

以前的討論模模糊糊,
結局根本沒有定論

還是說
OG10th的題目就只能窩在OG10th裡頭討論呢
我都是有看過之前的討論才來的

以前沒有討論清楚的地方
非常歡迎繼續討論喔
不過請直接用以前的討論串回文討論
這樣大家以後要看某一題的討論串
就可以在一個連結看到了喔
謝謝啦~~