Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]考古題form26-23

[問題]考古題form26-23

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]考古題form26-23

文章jasminelcj » 2005-07-03 02:28

By shoeing that South Africa does not have a free market and is in fact a kind of collectivist welfare state for Whites only, Sowell argues that American conscervatives have no vaild ideological grounds to be in sympath with Pretoria regime.

(A)to be in sympath with
(B)to sympathize with
(C)for sympathizing with
(D)that they should sympathize with
(E)that they should have sympathy for

ans:C
想請問為什麼B選項不行? 與C選項間有何差異
謝謝
jasminelcj
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 24
註冊時間: 2005-05-17 22:27

Re: [問題]考古題form26-23

文章sandarac » 2005-07-03 04:02

jasminelcj \$m[1]:By shoeing that South Africa does not have a free market and is in fact a kind of collectivist welfare state for Whites only, Sowell argues that American conscervatives have no vaild ideological grounds to be in sympath with Pretoria regime.

(A)to be in sympath with
(B)to sympathize with
(C)for sympathizing with
(D)that they should sympathize with
(E)that they should have sympathy for

ans:C
想請問為什麼B選項不行? 與C選項間有何差異
謝謝


應該是慣用吧...no ground for...沒根據,沒理由
Sandarac Lee, MBA, Class of 2008
_____________________________________________________
Account Manager, Chemex Industrial Co., Ltd.
大城小事/Formosa同學會-Schulich School of Business 版主
"沒有人能決定雁的去留,只有雲可以..."
頭像
sandarac
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 539
註冊時間: 2004-11-05 00:23
來自: 台南

Re: [問題]考古題form26-23

文章維尼 » 2005-07-05 13:49

sandarac \$m[1]:
jasminelcj \$m[1]:By shoeing that South Africa does not have a free market and is in fact a kind of collectivist welfare state for Whites only, Sowell argues that American conscervatives have no vaild ideological grounds to be in sympath with Pretoria regime.

(A)to be in sympath with
(B)to sympathize with
(C)for sympathizing with
(D)that they should sympathize with
(E)that they should have sympathy for

ans:C
想請問為什麼B選項不行? 與C選項間有何差異
謝謝


應該是慣用吧...no ground for...沒根據,沒理由


不過
我手上的朗文字典
可以查到

▶REASON◀
grounds[ plural]a good reason for doing, believing, or saying something

grounds for (doing) something
Mental cruelty can be grounds for divorce .There are strong grounds for believing his statement.

have grounds to do something
Did the police have reasonable grounds to arrest him?

是不是用 to V 也可以了呢?
MBA Class of 2009, UCLA Anderson School of Management

With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. -- "I Have a Dream", Martin Luther King, Jr.
頭像
維尼
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1194
註冊時間: 2005-02-21 17:41

文章cocaine » 2005-07-05 20:18

絕大多看到是 ground for xx ,
ground to v挺少看到的..
這題真難選押.
努力,才有甜蜜的果實
頭像
cocaine
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 502
註冊時間: 2004-12-23 23:53
來自: Mar

文章meefoo » 2006-03-22 11:59

這題也是大全987-190 有討論: http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopi ... rounds+for
結論就是:
be/have/give grounds + for + Ving/N
比 grounds + to 好
meefoo
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 49
註冊時間: 2005-09-29 16:15


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 4 位訪客

cron