大全3-20

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

大全3-20

帖子Huang Hsin-Yi » 2008-06-26 12:54

20. The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment.
When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.
Which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it cannot be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?
(A) The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.
(B) The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.
(C) If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.
(D) The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person without making that withdrawal known.
(E) If there is more than one prospective nominee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

Ans:E

說實在滴,選對
但是用猜的 ;-$
Huang Hsin-Yi
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
帖子: 1038
注册: 2007-08-17 00:41
地址: Tainan

回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 6 位游客