[問題]PP1 Q2

[little8]

2. (24227-!-item-!-188;#058&000711)

Economist: On average, the emergency treatment for an elderly person for injuries resulting from a fall costs $11,000. A new therapeutic program can significantly reduce an elderly person's chances of falling. Though obviously desirable for many reasons, this treatment program will cost $12,500 and thus cannot be justified.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion of the argument?

(A)Among elderly people who had followed the program for only a few months, the number of serious falls reported was higher than it was for people who had followed the program for its recommended minimum length of one year.
(B) Falls resulting in serious injuries are less common among elderly people living in nursing homes than they are among elderly people who live alone at home.
(C) A frequent result of injuries sustained in falls is long-term pain, medication for which is not counted among the average per-person costs of emergency treatment for elderly people's injuries from such falls.
(D) The new therapeutic program focuses on therapies other than medication, since overmedication can cause disorientation and hence increase the likelihood that an elderly person will have a serious fall.
(E) A significant portion of the cost of the new therapeutic program is represented by regular visits by health care professionals, the costs of which tend to increase more rapidly than do those of other elements of the program.

答案C

最近看這題,怎麼突然想不通,請大大們解答一下...
此外,劃粗體的部分可否解釋一下句意是什麼?

[小花]

雖然有許多原因吸引人,但此療程花費 12,500因此恐怕無法達到經濟效益

個人淺見

[babylarrivee]

想問，雖然這題答案我認為沒有問題，但D選項為何不能選? 看似也對的說....

[sleeplessboy[origen]]

這題是OG的問題, 在這裡討論還蠻多的, 先搜尋, 爬一下文再問吧！