pp2-15

[amanikang]

15.
Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In some countries it is not illegal for a company to drive away competitors by selling a product below cost.
(B) Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.
(C) As part of promotions designed to attract new customers, airlines sometimes reduce their ticket prices to below an economically sustainable level.
(D) On deciding to stop serving particular routes, most airlines shift resources to other routes rather than reduce the size of their operations.
(E) When airlines dramatically reduce their fares on a particular route, the total number of air passengers on that route increases greatly.

請問B為什麼對ㄋ 還是我翻譯有問題?
飛機的老闆普遍相信使用低價來對付競爭者
在有新的競爭者出現時
是很可能再一次被拿來應用的?

[amanikang]

自己頂一下

如果說是因為同一招被重複用就代表這招是有效的
但也只能證明他可以成功drive away他的競爭者
不能弱化作者說的 profitable?
或說B weaken了什麼ㄋ?

[lucyyeh]

這一題在CR版已經出現四胞胎了，這個是我幫你搜尋到一個我覺得最清楚的答案
http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopi ... nes#182617
建議下次請多用關鍵字搜尋，利人利己。

請版主鎖一下吧!