pp2-17

[ajama]

我的看法好像有點怪, 雖然答案做對了. 在這提出給大家參考一下.

題目 : H餐廳換桌椅可以增加利潤, 因為客人的週轉率變高.
問題 : 這個立論是很薄弱的, 因為它建基於一個前提, 這個前提就是...

我是把這題當成assumption來做, 也就是找一個可以支撐這個立論的答案.
而C的答案我是譯成 : 大多數的客人都會在餐廳留很久, 但是選擇坐比較高的桌子的客人則會是例外 (他們會很快走人).

小小意見供大家參考.

[craigchsieh]

我的看法好像有點怪, 雖然答案做對了. 在這提出給大家參考一下.

題目 : H餐廳換桌椅可以增加利潤, 因為客人的週轉率變高.
問題 : 這個立論是很薄弱的, 因為它建基於一個前提, 這個前提就是...

我是把這題當成assumption來做, 也就是找一個可以支撐這個立論的答案.
而C的答案我是譯成 : 大多數的客人都會在餐廳留很久, 但是選擇坐比較高的桌子的客人則會是例外 (他們會很快走人).

小小意見供大家參考.

好像解讀反了，可以參考2樓的解釋

[游客]

17. (26864-!-item-!-188;#058&003368)

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
(C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

GMAT的推論題不用推論 只看相不相關
讀完我就選了C

推海無涯 回頭是岸