[問題]gwd3-35

由 **davidlee0222** » 2004-12-20 23:47

Q35:
(前四個字固定是廢話)The passage suggests that the historian(問歷史學家-後面補述先跳) mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) would be most likely to agree(就是例子裡的歷史學家同意啥?) with which of the following assertions regarding(關於A的說法) Alessandra Strozzi?
文章已經了解,看完題目心理要先有答案-他同意A是由家庭社群構成的集合
A. Alessandra was able to act more independently than most women(沒提到其他女人-刪) of her time because she was a widow.
B. Alessandra was aware(她蛇麼也不知道-刪,後面不要浪費時間看) that her personal motivation was embedded in a social context.
C. Alessandra had goals and interests similar to those of many other widows(沒提到其他寡婦-刪) in her society.
D. Alessandra is an example of a Renaissance woman who expressed her individuality through independent action.(敘述沒有錯誤-保留)
E. Alessandra was exceptional(沒提到她是特例-刪) because she was able to effect changes in the social constraints placed upon women in her society.
答案D
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q36:
It can be inferred(小心infer這個字-ETS粉建,可能考推論也可能考細節) that the author作者 (of the passage廢話,難到還有別篇嗎) believes(考作者態度) which of the following about the study of Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian(作者相信例子裡的歷史學家的”研究”如何-後面廢話不要浪費時間看,例子的作者就只有那麼一個) mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42)?
若了解文章,在讀文章時就知道看到34行indeed是作者意見,當時已預測考題-作者同意研究的那個”歷史學家”對個人定義最後是向人類學家說法(人是社群的集合)靠攏
讓答案自己來找你
A. Alessandra was atypical(非典型-未提:刪,後面叮叮噹噹不要浪費時間) of her time and was therefore an inappropriate choice for the subject of the historian’s research.
B. In order to bolster her thesis, the historian adopted the anthropological perspective on personhood.(並沒有接受人類學家的概念來支持,僅結論與人類學家說法接近)
C. The historian argues that the boundaries of the conceptual self were not always firm and closed in Renaissance Europe.(要小心-這是作者意見)
D. In her study, the historian reverts to a traditional approach(並沒提到傳統方法-刪) that is out of step with the work of other historians of Renaissance Europe.
E. The interpretation of Alessandra’s actions that the historian puts forward is not supported by much of the historian’s research.(沒錯,因為大多數歷史學家認為個人獨立於自然跟社群之外)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q37:
In the first paragraph, the author(作者-後3字永遠跳過) of the passage mentions(提到) a contention(一個被人類學家提出的說法) that would be made by an anthropologist most likely in order to(考功能)
作者第一段提到人類學家作用為何-心中要有功能: 提供一個概念讓第二段例子中的歷史學家研究的結論靠近
A. present a theory that will be undermined in the discussion of a historian’s study(並沒有破壞歷史學家的研究討論,而是使歷史學家的結論靠近) later in the passage
B. offer a perspective on the concept of personhood that can usefully be applied to the study of women in Renaissance Europe(沒錯-保留)
C. undermine the view(並沒有破壞誰的論點-刪) that the individuality of European women of the Renaissance was largely suppressed
D. argue that anthropologists have applied the Western concept of individualism in their research(並沒有接受西方概念-是歷史學家才有)
E. lay the groundwork for the conclusion that Alessandra’s is a unique case(並沒有提到A是特例-刪) among European women of the Renaissance whose lives have been studied by historians

由 **davidlee0222** » 2004-12-21 12:25

回應Behemoth
感謝您的鼓勵
雖然隱姓埋名還是被您發現了...
就是因為椰林最近都在忙申請的討論
小弟才趕快轉戰本站教學相長
本站高手如雲
小弟相當榮幸與各位合作~

由 **liwuu** » 2004-12-21 15:20

davidlee0222 \$m[1]:回應Behemoth
感謝您的鼓勵
雖然隱姓埋名還是被您發現了...
就是因為椰林最近都在忙申請的討論
小弟才趕快轉戰本站教學相長
本站高手如雲
小弟相當榮幸與各位合作~

是大衛新聞台的那個人嗎?!看到你整篇的解釋...總覺得厲害得恐怖!!

由 **sandyclub** » 2005-01-02 03:29

對不起... 我還是不懂要怎麼樣回頭定位（D）expressed her individuality through independent action...

由 **davidlee0222** » 2005-01-03 00:34

基本上了解文章就不太需要回文定位
因為多半已經在讀文時就已了解或take note
否則可能代表您不了解本篇文章

回文定位除非細節題
而也會在您的note中有紀錄
僅為了更確定細節無誤而回文

當您不甚了解該篇文章時
回文定位可能會更破壞您對文章結構及內容的了解
實際例子就是本題

基本上本題在回文定位時
完全無法找到任何答案
但在讀文時了解第二段內容及功能意義
即可判段除了其他選項都錯
只有D描述無誤
因此選D
被研究者以獨立行為來表達她的個人
並沒有錯
然而她的個人是由她的週遭群體關係構成
與D選項並沒有違背
但文章裡完全找不到
就是要為了要陰回文定位的習慣

建議方法是要自己花點功夫研究個10到20篇文章結構
加強整體閱讀實力
就會出現閱讀進步
不然出國後唸到的paper比AT難的比比皆示

由訪客 » 2005-01-03 12:55

liwuu \$m[1]:
davidlee0222 \$m[1]:回應Behemoth
感謝您的鼓勵
雖然隱姓埋名還是被您發現了...
就是因為椰林最近都在忙申請的討論
小弟才趕快轉戰本站教學相長
本站高手如雲
小弟相當榮幸與各位合作~

是大衛新聞台的那個人嗎?!看到你整篇的解釋...總覺得厲害得恐怖!!

深表認同阿....
大衛阿
要不要再RC板上開個大衛閱讀教學
我們對閱讀有問題的,就把問題丟上來,你診斷一下
讓你太閒實在太可惜了.... 8-|

由 **iamdior** » 2005-01-05 14:08

Q36:
It can be inferred that the author of the passage believes which of the following about the study of Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42)?

A. Alessandra was atypical of her time and was therefore an inappropriate choice for the subject of the historian’s research.
B. In order to bolster her thesis, the historian adopted the anthropological perspective on personhood.
C. The historian argues that the boundaries of the conceptual self were not always firm and closed in Renaissance Europe.
D. In her study, the historian reverts to a traditional approach that is out of step with the work of other historians of Renaissance Europe.
E. The interpretation of Alessandra’s actions that the historian puts forward is not supported by much of the historian’s research.

請教為何答案是E
答案C哪裡錯呢?

由 **davidlee0222** » 2005-01-10 20:07

因為C是歷史學家說的意見
題目問作者意見
最後那幾句話就是作者意見
符合E

由 **shine822** » 2005-08-16 18:18

davidlee0222 \$m[1]:Q35:
The passage suggests that the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) would be most likely to agree with which of the following assertions regarding Alessandra Strozzi?

A.Alessandra was able to act more independently than most women(沒提到其他女人-刪) of her time because she was a widow.
B.Alessandra was aware(她蛇麼也不知道-刪,後面不要浪費時間看) that her personal motivation was embedded in a social context.
C.Alessandra had goals and interests similar to those of many other widows(沒提到其他寡婦-刪) in her society.
D.Alessandra is an example of a Renaissance woman who expressed her individuality through independent action.(敘述沒有錯誤-保留)
E.Alessandra was exceptional(沒提到她是特例-刪) because she was able to effect changes in the social constraints placed upon women in her society.
答案D

如果 ABCE 是因為沒提到 most women, other widows, aware, adnd exceptional 然後就刪了這些選項，我是還蠻同意的。

不過，正確答案D 的express her individuality through independent action. 要從哪些句子推論出來，我真的就完全沒概念了.....

救救我吧！！ mt03

由 **sleek** » 2005-08-31 21:54

題目是說the historian ... would be most likely to agree with ...
所以找的是this historian的想法:
如下述,可與(D)--"express her individuality through independent action"對照

This historian
(25) assumes that Alessandra had goals
and interests different from those of her
sons

供您參考

由 **shine822** » 2005-09-07 00:31

sleek \$m[1]:題目是說the historian ... would be most likely to agree with ...
所以找的是this historian的想法:
如下述,可與(D)--"express her individuality through independent action"對照

This historian
(25) assumes that Alessandra had goals
and interests different from those of her
sons

供您參考

恩！降說明，我懂了∼感謝您......

由 **davidslin** » 2005-09-20 15:44

[quote="davidlee0222"]Q35:
(前四個字固定是廢話)The passage suggests that the historian(問歷史學家-後面補述先跳) mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) would be most likely to agree(就是例子裡的歷史學家同意啥?) with which of the following assertions regarding(關於A的說法) Alessandra Strozzi?
文章已經了解,看完題目心理要先有答案-他同意A是由家庭社群構成的集合
想要請教上面這句話,我覺得是歷史學家應該是同意A是獨立的吧,而非家庭社群的構成,這樣才符合選項D的說明不是嗎?
D. Alessandra is an example of a Renaissance woman who expressed her individuality through independent action.(敘述沒有錯誤-保留)

答案D
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q36:
It can be inferred(小心infer這個字-ETS粉建,可能考推論也可能考細節) that the author作者 (of the passage廢話,難到還有別篇嗎) believes(考作者態度) which of the following about the study of Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian(作者相信例子裡的歷史學家的”研究”如何-後面廢話不要浪費時間看,例子的作者就只有那麼一個) mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42)?
若了解文章,在讀文章時就知道看到34行indeed是作者意見,當時已預測考題-作者同意研究的那個”歷史學家”對個人定義最後是向人類學家說法(人是社群的集合)靠攏
讓答案自己來找你

E. The interpretation of Alessandra’s actions that the historian puts forward is not supported by much of the historian’s research.(沒錯,因為大多數歷史學家認為個人獨立於自然跟社群之外)
如果35題中歷史學家同意A是由家庭社群構成的集合,那他提出的解釋不就可以被他的研究結果支持嗎?
可是36題答案是E,也就是說歷史學家提出的解釋,無法被他的研究結果支持,不就互相矛盾?
E選項的翻譯應該是[那位歷史學家提出對A的解釋,不被他自己大部分的研究支持](不懂這裡跟大多數歷史學家有什麼關係?)

看完全文我還是不太清楚,到底最後那位歷史學家的論點是支持作者的看法,還是跟其他歷史學家一樣?(照大衛大說,應該是支持作者看法)因為文章中只有說到他假設A是獨立的,但是後面作者解釋到可是他的研究所揭露的應該是跟人類學家的相似(可是這句話是作者說的,所以並不知道最後那位歷史學家是不是因為這樣改變了當初的假設,還是他繼續覺得A是獨立的?)

由 **davidslin** » 2005-10-14 21:52

後來又重看這篇,
覺得該篇大意應該是如下:

大多數歷史學家認為婦女是獨立的,但是有個人類學家覺得是社群的集合,然後作者舉了某個歷史學家的對A的研究,她(該歷史學家)的假設跟大多數歷史學家一樣,都是認為婦女是獨立的 This historian assumes that Alessandra had goals and interests different from those of her
sons, yet much of the historian’s own research reveals that Alessandra acted primarily as a champion of her sons’ interests, taking their goals as her own......
yet這邊帶出來的是作者的意見,意思是說雖然該歷史學家假設婦女是獨立的,可是她研究所透露出的卻是跟人類學家的觀點相近(是社群的集合),yet之後都是作者的意見,而非該歷史學家後來又改變了觀點而貼近人類學家.

GWD-3-Q35:
The passage suggests that the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) would be most likely to agree with which of the following assertions regarding Alessandra Strozzi?
D.Alessandra is an example of a Renaissance woman who expressed her individuality through independent action.
所以這一題才會是D,因為該歷史學家自始至終都認為婦女是獨立的,儘管他的研究透露出婦女表現是社群的集合(可能該歷史學家先入為主的觀念使她察覺不到她研究所透漏的,或是她知道了但死不承認她假設是錯的)

GWD-3-Q36:
It can be inferred that the author of the passage believes which of the following about the study of Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42)?

E.The interpretation of Alessandra’s actions that the historian puts forward is not supported by much of the historian’s research.

所以這一題才會是E,(該歷史學家對A行為的解釋不被她的研究所支持)
因為她解釋A是獨立的,可是她研究所透露的卻是A其實是社群的集合.....

這一題我也是看了蠻多次才覺得這樣解釋是合理的,如果認為該歷史學家後來改變觀點,變成跟人類學家一樣,要是這題改成

GWD-3-Q35:
The passage suggests that the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) would be most likely to agree with which of the following assertions regarding Alessandra Strozzi?

A.Alessandra is an example of a Renaissance woman who expressed her individuality through independent action.
B.Alessandra's actions are defined within a complex
web of social relationships.

不就要選B了...... :sad

由 **shine822** » 2005-10-21 23:14

davidslin \$m[1]:後來又重看這篇,
覺得該篇大意應該是如下:

大多數歷史學家認為婦女是獨立的,但是有個人類學家覺得是社群的集合,然後作者舉了某個歷史學家的對A的研究,她(該歷史學家)的假設跟大多數歷史學家一樣,都是認為婦女是獨立的
yet這邊帶出來的是作者的意見,意思是說雖然該歷史學家假設婦女是獨立的,可是她研究所透露出的卻是跟人類學家的觀點相近(是社群的集合),yet之後都是作者的意見,而非該歷史學家後來又改變了觀點而貼近人類學家.

這一題我也是看了蠻多次才覺得這樣解釋是合理的,如果認為該歷史學家後來改變觀點,變成跟人類學家一樣,要是這題改成

GWD-3-Q35:
The passage suggests that the historian mentioned in the second paragraph (lines 19-42) would be most likely to agree with which of the following assertions regarding Alessandra Strozzi?

A.Alessandra is an example of a Renaissance woman who expressed her individuality through independent action.
B.Alessandra's actions are defined within a complex
web of social relationships.

不就要選B了......

哇∼我覺得你分析得好有道理！ mt09

不過就像你之前說的「yet之後都是作者的意見,而非該歷史學家後來又改變了觀點而貼近人類學家.」可見那位女性歷史學家好像還是不肯承認「社會」這個看法，所以你的自編題應該是 A 而不是 B 吧∼

你覺得呢？

由 **shine822** » 2005-10-21 23:32

davidlee0222 \$m[1]: Indeed, one could argue that(有人會說xxx:作者自己預設反駁意見-表示作者贊同另一看法) Alessandra did not distinguish her personhood from that of her sons(有人會說A不把自己與小孩分開來看-事實上作者不以為然). In Renaissance Europe(形容詞片語補述後面主辭) the boundaries(主辭:xx的範圍) of the conceptual self(概念自我的範圍) were not always(主要動辭:並不總是) firm and closed(概念自我的範圍並不總是固定而封閉) and(對等連接詞帶出平行定義) did not necessarily(也並不必然)coincide(與xx巧合,交疊) with the boundaries of the bodily self.(一下又來6行…好像很恐怖-其實還是粉簡單)(概念自我的範圍並不總是固定而封閉,也並不必然與身體的自我交疊)

真糟糕！都已經翻得這麼詳細了，但是文章最後兩句，我還是不清楚。i89
作者認為（自提別人會反駁的理由）有人會說A不把自己與小孩分開來看指的是：別人會反駁說A其實跟小孩一樣。

降不就跟作者意見相同了嗎？？那還反駁什麼呢？

至於超級抽象的最後一句說明「概念自我」與「實體自我」並不衝突，到底在解釋些什麼啊？（不要逼我去請教哲學系的同學啊！） mt08

[問題]gwd3-35

誰在線上