[問題]GWD24-25

[colorr]

In a 1918 editorial, W.E.B. Du Bois advised African Americans to stop agitating for agitating for equality and to proclaim the solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War. The editorial surprised many Africa Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the (10) accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T. Washington. In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists (15) such as William Trotter. In 1895, when Washington called on African Americans to concentrate on improving their communities instead of opposing discrimination and agitating for (20) political rights, Du Bois praised Washington’s speech. In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions.(20)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances. Du Bois’ accommodationism did not last, however. Upon learning of(/on?) systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.

25. According to the passage, which of the following is true of the strategy that Du Bois’ 1918 editorial urged African Americans to adopt during the First World War?

A) It was a strategy that Du Bois had consistently rejected in the past.

B) It represented a compromise between Du Bois’ own views and those of Trotter.

C) It represented a significant redefinition of the long-term goals Du Bois held prior to the war.

D) It was advocated by Du Bois in response to his recognition of the discrimination faced by African Americans during the war.

E) It was advocated by Du Bois in part because of his historical knowledge of gains African Americans had made during past wars.

答案是E，
雖然覺得其他四個答案都不對，但看不懂E是什麼意思呢？
另外，
要請大家教我如何解讀紅色字的那一段話，
好複雜 @@@
謝謝各位

[Behemoth]

建議發帖時可先瀏覽置頂連結
若已發文可直接在開帖回文發問即可喔~~

http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=2797

[GoldDigger]

然而在1903年時DB和TW的軍事反對者結盟，不盡然是為了他的理念而主要是因為了T向他描述W為了消除非裔美國記者們反對W的聲浪. 這件事是一個因應實際的反應,這反應是來自於面臨政府官員威脅了非裔美國人在一次大戰時為爭取法律及政治上的人權所作的努力,而不是DB自己目標理念有所改變.

E就是說他了解"非裔美國人在一次大戰時為爭取法律及政治上的人權所作的努力"

[colorr]

建議發帖時可先瀏覽置頂連結
若已發文可直接在開帖回文發問即可喔~~

http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=2797

抱歉抱歉 ，下次會注意的

[colorr]

然而在1903年時DB和TW的軍事反對者結盟，不盡然是為了他的理念而主要是因為了T向他描述W為了消除非裔美國記者們反對W的聲浪. 這件事是一個因應實際的反應,這反應是來自於面臨政府官員威脅了非裔美國人在一次大戰時為爭取法律及政治上的人權所作的努力,而不是DB自己目標理念有所改變.

E就是說他了解"非裔美國人在一次大戰時為爭取法律及政治上的人權所作的努力"

還是有點不懂，那his long-term goals 的his是指DB而不是W嗎？

另外.....in the face of social pressure that governmenr officials had threatened African Americans' contributions to past war efforts that had brought them......

句子是不是省略這兩個that？

謝謝你的回答喔，
麻煩各位再教教我，感謝

[GoldDigger]

我認為his是指DB.....
文中主要在說DB的立場一再改變
這篇好像有漏字 LINE 20的開頭....怪怪的



應該是 Booker, T. Washington 及 William Trotter
難道有Booker, Trotter. Washington嗎??
下面有出現幾個名字好像錯亂
Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions.......

[peche]

Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter, Washington’s militant opponent....

可能只是少了一個逗號 ~

[Janet]

24-27: The passage indicates which of the following about Du Bois’ attitude toward Washington?

B) It underwent a shift in 1903 for reasons other than Du Bois’ disagreement with Washington’s accommodationist views.

D) It remained consistently positive even though Du Bois disagreed with Washington’s efforts to control the African American press.

ans:B

這個選項本來BD選不出來,但是看到D有個positive,刪D,

但是還是看不懂B再說什麼,什麼是other than Du Bois’ disagreement with Washington’s accommodationist views??

翻譯成,除了Du Bois不同意W調整的觀點這原因,

這樣怎麼會對呢?

回歸文章
reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political advances

看不出B為何對? 請解惑~謝謝~~

[林小馬]

24-27: The passage indicates which of the following about Du Bois’ attitude toward Washington?

B) It underwent a shift in 1903 for reasons other than Du Bois’ disagreement with Washington’s accommodationist views.

但是還是看不懂B再說什麼,什麼是other than Du Bois’ disagreement with Washington’s accommodationist views??

翻譯成,除了Du Bois不同意W調整的觀點這原因,

這樣怎麼會對呢?
看不出B為何對? 請解惑~謝謝~~

In 1895, when Washington called on African Americans to concentrate on improving their communities instead of opposing discrimination and agitating for (20) political rights, Du Bois praised Washington’s speech. In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter, Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions.

你看喔
1895的時候DB還是站在Washington那邊的
1903就變成站到Trotter那邊(反Washington)
而不是為了ideological reason
(不是因為他不贊成Washington的觀點)
而是因為Trotter跟他講Washington的壞話
講說Washington有試圖打壓反對W的非裔美國人之類的

[Janet]

感謝小馬!! 我想我真的卡到單字ideological,所以基本上DB沒有不贊成W觀點,

一次解到我兩個疑問~~~

所以D也錯,因為D錯在disagree~

感謝~~^^

[小茉莉]

[quote="林小馬

你看喔
1895的時候DB還是站在Washington那邊的
1903就變成站到Trotter那邊(反Washington)
而不是為了ideological reason
(不是因為他不贊成Washington的觀點)
而是因為Trotter跟他講Washington的壞話
講說Washington有試圖打壓反對W的非裔美國人之類的[/quote]
__________________________________________________

這題Q25會不會是A
關於E我有一個疑問
在第一段裡 說明這個策略是支持Washington.的
In a 1918 editorial, W.E.B. Du Bois advised African Americans to stop agitating for agitating for equality and to proclaim the solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War.
且時間點在1918也就是在1903年他站到Trotter那邊(反Washington)之後
好怪呀!為何在反W後又提出一個意見是支持W的(因The editorial surprised many Africa Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the (10) accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T. Washington.)

所以這篇文章主旨是可能是Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists (15) such as William Trotter.(所以Q26會不會是D~~~這篇文章真是奇怪呀)


而Q25 A It was a strategy that Du Bois had consistently rejected in the past.符合這個行為的敘述

[小茉莉]

這篇在模考時花了我粉多時間 又還錯2題
不甘心
做一下筆記大家討論討論

In a 1918 editorial, W.E.B. Du Bois advised African Americans to stop agitating for
equality and to proclaim the solidarity with White Americans for the duration of the First World War. The editorial surprised many Africa Americans who viewed Du Bois as an uncompromising African American leader and a chief opponent of the (10) accommodationist tactics urged by Booker, T. Washington.
B君在1918年(First World War後期)寫一篇文章要黑人與白人合作 這文章嚇了黑人一跳因為黑人認為B是各不妥協的黑人領導者及W的妥協論的主要反對者
In fact, however, Du Bois often shifted positions along the continuum between Washington and confrontationists (15) such as William Trotter.
事實上才不是這麼一回事哩! B君搖擺不定在W與T間
In 1895, when Washington called on African Americans to concentrate on improving their communities instead of opposing discrimination and agitating for (20) political rights, Du Bois praised Washington’s speech.
先說B在1895年支持W
In 1903, however, Du Bois aligned himself with Trotter,(我把,加上) Washington’s militant opponent, less for ideological reasons (25) than because Trotter had described to him Washington’s efforts to silence those in the African American press who opposed Washington’s positions.
但B在1903年又與T同夥去反對W不是因為理想而是因T說W的壞話
這兒可能有漏字(20)reflected not a change in his long-term goals but rather a pragmatic response in the face of social pressure(我加that) government officials had threatened African Americans’ contributions to past war efforts had brought them some legal and political (40) advances.
這不是反應B長期目標的改變而是實用理由(在面臨政府官員威脅到黑人因過去戰爭上的功勞所取得的政治地位)
Du Bois’ accommodationism did not last, however. Upon learning of(/on?) systematic discrimination experienced by African Americans in the military, he called on them to “return fighting” from the war.
這一段不是粉瞭~~不過好像說 但B君這樣的態度沒有持續~~~後來又變了

如果我看的沒錯,作者好像只是在說這個B君態度變來變去的~~~
所以
Q25 A
Q26 D contest (Longman: to question the truth or rightness)

請討論 有錯請指正

[小茉莉]

想了一想
關於Q25 A It was a strategy that Du Bois had consistently rejected in the past.好像也不好因為B君一直改變態度並不是過去都沒變這一次突然變的 所以A也不妥

還有Q26 D也不好~contest(=question)the view that Du Bois was significantly influenced by either Washington or Trotter
我真是頭昏昏
還是C好開宗明義就說這個editorial嚇黑人 但其實一點也不嚇 因為B君本來就變來變去

誰能告訴我~~到底1918年支持W的editorial是因何而來的???
1918年一次大戰到底結束了沒???

[haohao]

一次大戰好像是1914-1918

Q25的 E
請問文章哪裡看的出來是E?
而且為什麼是"past war" 明明那時候戰爭應該還沒結束或剛結束啊...

Q26的C我也有一樣的問題
總覺得文章談論的時間 不僅限於一次大戰而已不是嗎?

另外我還想請問文章的一個問題
1895 DB是傾向於W
1903 又背離W
然後到文章末 也是背離W
那為什麼倒數第2句 Du Bois’ accommodationism did not last, however.
會有個"however"
因為我看起來 這裡就沒有轉折啦
我是不是哪裡有誤會了...?

[uioxcv]

這是我從CD上整理來的解釋~

Q25: According to the passage, which of the following is true of the strategy that Du Bois’ 1918 editorial urged African Americans to adopt during the First World War?
A) It was a strategy that Du Bois had consistently rejected in the past.
B) It represented a compromise between Du Bois’ own views and those of Trotter.
C) It represented a significant redefinition of the long-term goals Du Bois held prior to the war.
D) It was advocated by Du Bois in response to his recognition of the discrimination faced by African Americans during the war.
E) It was advocated by Du Bois in part because of his historical knowledge of gains African Americans had made during past wars.

Bois老兄的行徑：1895：支持溫和派的W；1903：支持激進派的T，因為T和他講了W的行徑；1918：也就是本文討論的這個時期，bois又支持溫和政策，因為the past war taught him that AA could get legal and political advances if they contributed；1918後：文章結尾再次揭露bois老兄的多變，因為戰爭中的歧視問題，他又要return fighting；所以Q25，A：說"一貫"反對是錯的，bois是個來回變的人B：說1918editorial是bois和激進派的妥協，顯然說反了，1918editorial是接近溫和派觀點的。C：說這是bois長期目標的改變，顯然這位老兄從來沒有什麼長期目標。D：說1918editorial是軍隊中歧視問題的產物。也是錯的。軍隊中的歧視問題是在1918editorial之後發生的(1918後文章結尾再次揭露bois老兄的多變，因為戰爭中的歧視問題，他又要return fighting。)
E： bois從以前的經驗中得出，在這個時局下黑人放棄國內鬥爭，和白人共赴國難，能給黑人帶來政治和法律上的好處。即1918editorial是接近溫和派觀點的,選E.