由 mbaluke » 2007-09-05 11:31
文章main idea為討論史前印地安人類與更新世末期物種大滅絕的關係
Shepard Krech的主要理論
Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them.
沒有證據顯示在某些地區large animal 消失, 是因為史前印地安人獵食
Nor were extinctions confined to large animals: small animals, plants, and insects disappeared, presumably not all through human consumption.
滅絕也不限於large animal, 而且small animals, plants, and insects的滅絕也不可能都是因為人類的獵食或食用
Q6 Which of the following, if true, would most weaken Krech's objections to Martin's theory?
(B) New discoveries indicating that Paleoindians made use of the small animals, plants, and insects that became extinct.
這些滅絕的small animals, plants, and insects, 的確遭到史前印地安人類獵食或食用
Krech "also" contradicts Martin’s exclusion of climatic............. 次要理論
(C) 反了上句, 但also顯示其為Krech次要理論, 且與(B)相比, (C) 較偏離本文章的main idea, (C)討論的是天氣與物種滅絕的關係
兩相比較, 最佳的答案應為 (B), (C)沒有錯, 但沒有答案(B)好
Luke Liu
MBA Class'10
Babson College