Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]GMAT_GRE_LSAT閱讀全集 -PASSAGE 1(1/63)

[問題]GMAT_GRE_LSAT閱讀全集 -PASSAGE 1(1/63)

GMAT 考的是閱讀....閱讀....還是閱讀....

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]GMAT_GRE_LSAT閱讀全集 -PASSAGE 1(1/63)

文章whoops » 2007-05-02 23:37

(This passage was written in 1978.)
Recent years have brought minority-owned businesses in the United States unprecedented opportunities—as well as new and significant risks. Civil rights activists have long argued that one of the principal reasons why Blacks, Hispanics, and other minority groups have difficulty establishing themselves in business is that they lack access to the sizable orders and subcontracts that are generated by large companies. Now Congress, in apparent agreement, has required by law that businesses awarded federal contracts of more than $500,000 do their best to find minority subcontractors and record their efforts to do so on forms filed with the government. Indeed, some federal and local agencies have gone so far as to set specific percentage goals for apportioning parts of public works contracts to minority enterprises.
Corporate response appears to have been substantial. According to figures collected in 1977, the total of corporate contracts with minority businesses rose from $77 million in 1972 to $1.1 billion in 1977. The projected total of corporate contracts with minority businesses for the early 1980’s is estimated to be over 53 billion per year with no letup anticipated in the next decade. Promising as it is for minority businesses, this increased patronage poses dangers for them, too. First, minority firms risk expanding too fast and overextending themselves financially, since most are small concerns and, unlike large businesses, they often need to make substantial investments in new plants, staff, equipment, and the like in order to perform work subcontracted to them. If, thereafter, their subcontracts are for some reason reduced, such firms can face potentially crippling fixed expenses. (此處可定位到小公司擴展過快及財務況張過愾的風險及原因)The world of corporate purchasing can be frustrating for small entrepreneurs who get requests for elaborate formal estimates and bids. Both consume valuable time and resources, and a small company’s efforts must soon result in orders, or both the morale and the financial health of the business will suffer.
A second risk is that White-owned companies may seek to cash in on the increasing apportionments through formation of joint ventures with minority-owned concerns. Of course, in many instances there are legitimate reasons for joint ventures; clearly, White and minority enterprises can team up to acquire business that neither could acquire alone. But civil rights groups and minority business owners have complained to Congress about minorities being set up as “fronts” with White backing, rather than being accepted as full partners in legitimate joint ventures.
Third, a minority enterprise that secures the business of one large corporate customer often runs the danger of becoming—and remaining—dependent. Even in the best of circumstances, fierce competition from larger, more established companies makes it difficult for small concerns to broaden their customer bases: when such firms have nearly guaranteed orders from a single corporate benefactor, they may truly have to struggle against complacency arising from their current success.

2.The passage supplies information that would answer which of the following questions?
(A) What federal agencies have set percentage goals for the use of minority-owned businesses in public works contracts?
(B) To which government agencies must businesses awarded federal contracts report their efforts to find minority subcontractors?
(C) How widespread is the use of minority-owned concerns as “fronts” by White backers seeking to obtain subcontracts?
(D) How many more minority-owned businesses were there in 1977 than in 1972?
(E) What is one set of conditions under which a small business might find itself financially overextended?
答案是E選項,可是我在文章中只能定位出作者提到小公司為了拿到contract必須投入資本,常會有擴展過快或財務過分擴展的風險,無法找到小公司可能會發現其財務擴展過快的條件

4.The passage suggests that the failure of a large business to have its bids for subcontracts result quickly in orders might cause it to
(A) experience frustration but not serious financial harm
(B) face potentially crippling fixed expenses
(C) have to record its efforts on forms filed with the government
(D) increase its spending with minority subcontractors
(E) revise its procedure for making bids for federal contracts and subcontracts
答案是A選項,題目看的不是太懂,在文章中也沒能定位到相關的內容

上面兩題,和大家討論 *-)
If you have a dream, go get it!
頭像
whoops
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 95
註冊時間: 2006-02-09 23:44

我想問一下第七題

文章lucyyeh » 2008-01-23 00:43

7. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s assertion that, in the 1970’s, corporate response to federal requirements (lines 18-19) was substantial
(A) Corporate contracts with minority-owned businesses totaled $2 billion in 1979.
(B) Between 1970 and 1972, corporate contracts with minority-owned businesses declined by 25 percent.
(C) The figures collected in 1977 underrepresented the extent of corporate contracts with minority-owned businesses. (如underrepresented正好support)
(D) The estimate of corporate spending with minority-owned businesses in 1980 is approximately $10 million too high.
(E) The $1.1 billion represented the same percentage of total corporate spending in 1977 as did $77 million in 1972.

這題答案是E

我想問一下,E選怎麼突然提到corporate spending,不知道這個在講什麼?哪裡有提到呀?
lucyyeh
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 410
註冊時間: 2007-03-22 12:20

Re: [問題]GMAT_GRE_LSAT閱讀全集 -PASSAGE 1(1/63)

文章amazingslim » 2008-02-23 22:33

whoops \$m[1]:2.The passage supplies information that would answer which of the following questions?
(A) What federal agencies have set percentage goals for the use of minority-owned businesses in public works contracts?
(B) To which government agencies must businesses awarded federal contracts report their efforts to find minority subcontractors?
(C) How widespread is the use of minority-owned concerns as “fronts” by White backers seeking to obtain subcontracts?
(D) How many more minority-owned businesses were there in 1977 than in 1972?
(E) What is one set of conditions under which a small business might find itself financially overextended?
答案是E選項,可是我在文章中只能定位出作者提到小公司為了拿到contract必須投入資本,常會有擴展過快或財務過分擴展的風險,無法找到小公司可能會發現其財務擴展過快的條件

我覺得conditions在此是指情況

whoops \$m[1]:4.The passage suggests that the failure of a large business to have its bids for subcontracts result quickly in orders might cause it to
(A) experience frustration but not serious financial harm
(B) face potentially crippling fixed expenses
(C) have to record its efforts on forms filed with the government
(D) increase its spending with minority subcontractors
(E) revise its procedure for making bids for federal contracts and subcontracts
答案是A選項,題目看的不是太懂,在文章中也沒能定位到相關的內容

可以定位到The world of corporate purchasing can be frustrating for small entrepreneurs who get requests for elaborate formal estimates and bids. Both consume valuable time and resources, and a small company’s efforts must soon result in orders, or both the morale and the financial health of the business will suffer.
corporate purchasing 對接到大單小公司來說可能會很挫折,因為要投入寶貴時間及資源完成訂單,會傷到士氣及公司的財務健全(也就是大公司會財務正常)
amazingslim
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 147
註冊時間: 2007-08-11 17:14

Re: 我想問一下第七題

文章amazingslim » 2008-02-23 22:39

lucyyeh \$m[1]:7. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s assertion that, in the 1970’s, corporate response to federal requirements (lines 18-19) was substantial
(A) Corporate contracts with minority-owned businesses totaled $2 billion in 1979.
(B) Between 1970 and 1972, corporate contracts with minority-owned businesses declined by 25 percent.
(C) The figures collected in 1977 underrepresented the extent of corporate contracts with minority-owned businesses. (如underrepresented正好support)
(D) The estimate of corporate spending with minority-owned businesses in 1980 is approximately $10 million too high.
(E) The $1.1 billion represented the same percentage of total corporate spending in 1977 as did $77 million in 1972.

這題答案是E

我想問一下,E選怎麼突然提到corporate spending,不知道這個在講什麼?哪裡有提到呀?

兩年度占公司支出比例一樣,就不能說corporate response was substantial.
amazingslim
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 147
註冊時間: 2007-08-11 17:14

請問第七題的B選項

文章mupeane » 2008-04-15 10:17

(B) Between 1970 and 1972, corporate contracts with minority-owned businesses declined by 25 percent.

不是也減少嗎?
為什麼不能選B啊?
mupeane
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 25
註冊時間: 2007-05-20 10:21

Re: 請問第七題的B選項

文章chencraig0227 » 2008-05-06 16:40

mupeane \$m[1]:(B) Between 1970 and 1972, corporate contracts with minority-owned businesses declined by 25 percent.

不是也減少嗎?
為什麼不能選B啊?


發揮CR精神
本文是拿"72-77年"間做推論!
此(B)選項拿"70-72"來反駁
自然無關!!
頭像
chencraig0227
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 236
註冊時間: 2007-08-09 22:53


回到 GMAT Reading Comprehension 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 11 位訪客