davidslin \$m[1]:林小馬 \$m[1]:雖然前面有各路大俠的解釋
可是我還是有點看不懂這一段耶
The constructivists gain acceptance
by misrepresenting technological determinism:
technological determinists are
(35) supposed to believe, for example, that
machinery imposes appropriate forms
of order on society. The alternative to
constructivism, in other words, is to
view technology as existing outside
(40) society, capable of directly influencing
skills and work organization.
特別是畫紅色部分
他到底是在講contructivism還是在講determinist啊
如果是contructivism 那the alternative to不是很亦造成誤解嗎
如果是determinism 那不是跟前面講得不一樣嗎
( tech 在 society之外?? )
請大俠們幫幫忙喔
我覺得是在講contructivism耶,
這段contructivism提出兩種極端的看法,一種是machinery imposes appropriate forms of order on society(我感覺應該是[科技只是以適當的形式強加在社會之上]....應該是說科技是社會的附屬),一種technology as existing outside society, capable of directly influencing skills and work organization(科技在社會之外,可直接影響社會)
之後提到Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists by both theoretical and empirical arguments.
Clark揚棄constructivists這兩種極端的說法.......
我的解讀與davidslin大大稍有出入,大家斟酌參考
SC誤導大眾認為TD主張machinery imposes appropriate forms of order on society(科技將"適當形式"的命令強加於社會)
-->科技控制社會
SC主張technology as existing outside society, capable of directly influencing skills and work organization
-->科技影響社會,但不介入或控制社會
Clark在理論上和實務上屏棄constructivists這種極端的說法