Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - OG(VR)34

OG(VR)34

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

OG(VR)34

文章hhou1207[origen] » 2009-04-17 13:19

34. Lacking information about energy use, people tend to overestimate the amount
of energy used by <equipment, such as lights, that are visible and must be
turned on and off and underestimate that> used by unobtrusive equipment, such as
water heaters.

Correct Answer:
D. Visible equipment, such as lights, that must be turned on and off and underestimate that

The explanation for D is the following:
In this sentence, the two adj. "visible" & "unobtrusive" are parallel, and placing visible before equipment eliminates the verb and solves the agreement problem. The construction overestimate the amount of energy used by..and...underestimate that used by provides parallel structure


I chose E: visible equipment, such as lights, that must be turned on and off and underestimate it when
The explanation for E: "such as lights" is not parallel to unobtrusive; it when used by is not parallel to the amount used by.


我的問題是這兩個選項其實前面都是一模一樣的..但是為什麼在E選項的解釋裡
會說到such as lights is not parallel to unobtrusive?!另外..在D選項最後
"underestimate that" 這個that是指the amount of energy嗎?

謝謝大家的幫忙.
hhou1207[origen]
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 5
註冊時間: 2007-09-24 05:48

Re: OG(VR)34

文章god0204 » 2009-04-20 23:28

這題的KEY只有一個就是平衡,先不管it 與 that的部分,本句的原型是
overestimate the amount of energy used by visible equipment ,such as lights.......................underestimate the amount of energy used by unobtrusive equipment ,such as water heaters.這是一個相當對稱漂亮的句子

因此:
1.E的部分when根本沒有存在必要,不會選到E,至於OG的解答寫such as lights is not parallel to unobtrusive,我覺得很奇怪,因為such as lights是與such as water heaters平衡,所以......OG的說明別理他...
2.為簡化本句,當後面所使用代名詞與前同時使用that,those,因此,the amount of energy為單數,使用that.
god0204
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 3
註冊時間: 2008-09-23 18:44

Re: OG(VR)34

文章hhou1207[origen] » 2009-04-21 12:18

謝謝你的講解...當時我看到OG後面的解釋..還以為我是不是有哪一部份沒搞懂..
不過經過你的講解,有更清楚了! 謝謝!

god0204 \$m[1]:這題的KEY只有一個就是平衡,先不管it 與 that的部分,本句的原型是
overestimate the amount of energy used by visible equipment ,such as lights.......................underestimate the amount of energy used by unobtrusive equipment ,such as water heaters.這是一個相當對稱漂亮的句子

因此:
1.E的部分when根本沒有存在必要,不會選到E,至於OG的解答寫such as lights is not parallel to unobtrusive,我覺得很奇怪,因為such as lights是與such as water heaters平衡,所以......OG的說明別理他...
2.為簡化本句,當後面所使用代名詞與前同時使用that,those,因此,the amount of energy為單數,使用that.
hhou1207[origen]
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 5
註冊時間: 2007-09-24 05:48


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 6 位訪客