perp-T1-Q154

[hibiscus]

Some patients who do not respond to therapies for depression may simply have received inadequate treatment, having, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be effective or having been taken off a drug too soon.

(A) having, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be effective or having been
(B) having, for example, a drug prescription that was ineffective because the dosage was too low, or being
(C) as, for example, having too low of a dosage of a prescribed drug for it to be effective, or being
(D) when they have, for example, been prescribed too low a drug dosage to be effective, or were
(E) for example, when they have a drug prescription with a dosage too low to be effective, or been

答案.....A

各位大大..
當我看到這個題目的時候..會直接先刪掉A和B..因為having不選...
再加上我覺得是分裂結構..不好...
但是沒想到就直接刪掉了正確解答...
是不是以後看到having都不能馬上刪呢?
請問E錯在哪裡呢
謝謝

[la-vie]

莫杯杯說"having當「有」不選"
但是在這裡是完成式have been prescribed改成分詞 having been
沒有脫節，且分詞在句尾表示伴隨的情況
(A)是ok的!
(E)have a drug prescription太wordy
表示"動作狀態"主要還是以"動詞"prescribed表達比較簡潔
另外or前面不需要逗號；
還有第一個have當"有(verb)"解釋，所以been前面不能省略have(助V)

[dibert8]

莫伯伯說的好! 這個 have 當'有'解的確經常是錯誤答案的長相.

(A) having ... or having... 平衡; 現在分詞修飾前面主要子句

(E) when... or been... 不平衡; when 條件敘述,改變句意

[kaijen]

(A)for example插入的地方不是很怪嗎?
我覺得應該要放在having的前面 這樣才是平衡
另外為什麼(C)不對? having..being..還蠻平衡的

[hey]

原句應是Some patients who do not respond to therapies for depression may simply have received inadequate treatment and have, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be effective or have been taken off a drug too soon.
將其and刪掉,動詞改為分詞結構且前面打逗號即成選項(A)的答案
至於你所說的for example其實可以插在任何地方, 唯一的不同只是意思會有點不同而已
選項(C)有一個問題即是代名詞it的問題, 請問其要代哪個名詞???depression??? treatment???還是drug???且當選項有being盡量少選
因此選項(A)會是較好的答案

[pimi]

想請問as在當原因時, 就像C選項的答案, 如果前後主詞相同, 可以省略嗎??
EX:
We didn't know what to do as we were just visiting there.
可以改成以下這樣嗎??
We didn't know what to do as (being) just visiting there.

[chencraig0227]

想請問as在當原因時, 就像C選項的答案, 如果前後主詞相同, 可以省略嗎??
EX:
We didn't know what to do as we were just visiting there.
可以改成以下這樣嗎??
We didn't know what to do as (being) just visiting there.

我也想知道這個能不能省
不過as表原因在GMAT中很少見
唯一一題是在OG10-184中
不過此題因為主詞不同 所以也無法證明
字典中也都主詞不同...所以就姑且當作不行摟!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

另外! 這邊的分詞構句解釋為"伴隨"我覺得句意說不過去!
Some patients who do not respond to therapies for depression may simply have received inadequate treatment, having, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be effective or having been taken off a drug too soon.
文中出現"for example"且句意上應該是要補充說明"inadequate treatment"有哪些? 進而說"例如有用藥過輕..."等.
翻成有因果或時序關係的"表伴隨"可能不太適當.

[ad264]

OG有一直講AS是要接完整句子。
所以不要省比較好。
目前考題正確選項沒有看到有as + 分詞結構 (如果主詞被省)

[ad264]

我錯了，AS後面可以省主詞跟動詞

PP-T1-139

Among the surest indications on Earth of sunspot cycles is believed to be the rate at which trees grow, as seen in the rings visible in the cross sections of their trunks.

莫伯伯說過: as副詞子句修飾 grow，as後省略trees are

AS的用法真是多

[Kal-El]

另外! 這邊的分詞構句解釋為"伴隨"我覺得句意說不過去!
Some patients who do not respond to therapies for depression may simply have received inadequate treatment, having, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be effective or having been taken off a drug too soon.
文中出現"for example"且句意上應該是要補充說明"inadequate treatment"有哪些? 進而說"例如有用藥過輕..."等.
翻成有因果或時序關係的"表伴隨"可能不太適當.

伴隨也可是說明功能
且treatment是N, 和having涵義不同.
所以還是支持是伴隨

[larry.tw]

另外! 這邊的分詞構句解釋為"伴隨"我覺得句意說不過去!
Some patients who do not respond to therapies for depression may simply have received inadequate treatment, having, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be effective or having been taken off a drug too soon.
文中出現"for example"且句意上應該是要補充說明"inadequate treatment"有哪些? 進而說"例如有用藥過輕..."等.
翻成有因果或時序關係的"表伴隨"可能不太適當.

伴隨也可是說明功能
且treatment是N, 和having涵義不同.
所以還是支持是伴隨

我不太支持伴隨~~~
我覺得having分詞的邏輯主語應該是主句的主語(patients)的省略

另外我想請問
(A) having, for example, been prescribed a drug at a dosage too low to be effective or having been
(D) when they have, for example, been prescribed too low a drug dosage to be effective, or were

a dosage too low to be effective和
too low a drug dosage to be effective句型有什麼不一樣?

我覺得A正確答案直接too low好怪!?
麻煩請各位指導!

[ilikefm2]

不好意思我想請教一下大家
A跟B的選項 用 , having 會不會有歧異產生呢？

如： treatment, which have been described....

因為最近作題目常常遇到這個,+分詞的錯誤選項 而且這題的位置又在蠻中間的
讓我看到這個都不太敢選

[Enriqueta]

我不確定你說的歧異是指什麼，A、B選項的HAVING不一樣
A - Patients have been prescribed a drug ... => 完成式，和主句同樣
B - Patients have a drug prescription ...

題目是 - 部份對therapies for depression 沒反應的病人可能是have received inadequate treatment (曾經收到不當的治療)，例 如 A - 曾經吃過……藥方
B - 有…藥方

以文意、文法，A都比較對