[問題]GWD3-Q39

[illuna]

Q39:
Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.

A. Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

B. Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, they cost less,

C. Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with most sport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they

D. Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers,
compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

E. Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they


我的判斷是先從原題句尾未畫線的部分看到「,and」先平衡三個....

所以答案選項中為「cost less」的對...所以答案剩下ABD

接著我覺得這三個答案都有點怪...A跟B我還知道為什麼錯....

可是D....誰可以幫我把關代子句還原一下....我實在頭都快昏了....... :-S

[Grace]

Here is my thought:

D. Minivans, which carry as many
as seven passengers, which are compared
with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

第一個動詞 carry 表主動, compared則為被動
;)

[illuna]

Here is my thought:

D. Minivans, which carry as many
as seven passengers, which are compared
with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,

第一個動詞 carry 表主動, compared則為被動
;)

我當初也是這麼想....不過兩個形容詞子句中間可以沒有連接詞嗎?

這是我的疑問....

[agk99]

雖然說莫老師這題選D(理由忘了，我整理出來再貼上)
但我還是要幫A 再拉一票，注意喔，請把 A. Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, 中的
, compared with most sport utility vehicles,
看成是插入句，你不覺得A比D更好嗎

[魚]

報告 我也選了A

不過 仔細敗讀grace的解釋後 ,我就叛變了 (grace 真強 !! )
＜＜仔細的想一想，醬的擠壓變形雙重修飾，好像在楊鵬難句看過　我今天會去找找＞＞

我原本判讀的想法跟一樣 , 不過現在仔細一看 , 第一個and 似乎顯得多餘了

不知道大家的看法如何 ~

[agk99]

魚的說法我接受，多了那個and，是差了點
但garce的解法實在是太霹靂了，就直接都改分詞嗎?
,which are compared with most sport .....這個which可以跳過最近的passanger，直接去修飾minivans?
還是因為就怕誤解，才要改分詞?如果可以請Grace為我們上一堂關代改分詞面面觀的課

[游客]

D. Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers,
compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, ........

我想問一下 carrying....... 原句應該是Minivans, which carry as many
as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,.......

那 which carry.. 改成 carrying ...是不是很怪阿 我記得老師說 非限制形容詞片語或子句,不可改成分詞片語 不是嗎 這這題不是犯了此大忌????麻煩強者解答一下!

[micht]

我感覺這裡要用

carrying as many as seven passengers,.... cost less, get better gas mileage, ...., and have a smoother ride.

都是形容minivans..形容詞平衡... :P

can someone verify this?

[魚]

D. Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers,
compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, ........

我想問一下 carrying....... 原句應該是Minivans, which carry as many
as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,.......

那 which carry.. 改成 carrying ...是不是很怪阿 我記得老師說 非限制形容詞片語或子句,不可改成分詞片語 不是嗎 這這題不是犯了此大忌????麻煩強者解答一下!

D. Minivans which carrying as many as seven passengers,
compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, ........

應該是醬子,所以沒有違背莫北北定下 "真理"

[Behemoth]

現在看看 有個想法

d的原句或許就是a

但是就是因為a這樣寫不好,and亂平衡

所以就把carry改分詞前面加逗點一樣修飾minivans,句子就變漂亮了

但是魚說的那樣不是很懂, 請大魚指點迷津~

[魚]

現在看看 有個想法

d的原句或許就是a

但是就是因為a這樣寫不好,and亂平衡

所以就把carry改分詞前面加逗點一樣修飾minivans,句子就變漂亮了

但是魚說的那樣不是很懂, 請大魚指點迷津~

我同意啊 :D 一個句子本來就有很多種表示法. 偶也絕得A只是斷句段的亂

會說

D. Minivans which carrying as many as seven passengers,
compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less, ........

是因為剛剛在整理帖的時候看到小吳兄的提問 , 幫他還原一下霸了

這個句子應該不會有限定/非限定用法的問題

(嗯.....我的文字敘述一向很 ....不知道B爺了不了我要說滴 :-$ )

[Behemoth]

喔喔喔喔喔 還是不懂

是我沒說清楚

不懂的地方是 which carrying這邊不懂

如果這樣的話 那這句不就沒動詞了嗎?

[魚]

可以讓我偷改嗎 ?

我忘了把動詞還原了。。。。。。。。。。。 :-$

[liwuu]

我感覺這裡要用

carrying as many as seven passengers,.... cost less, get better gas mileage, ...., and have a smoother ride.

都是形容minivans..形容詞平衡... :P

can someone verify this?

現在才看到這一題,小小想法!!
1.我認為這個應該是動詞對稱,而非形容詞對稱...描述minivans三個動作(cost..., get..., and have...)

2.從語意來說,D比A容易看許多,雖然經過許多形容詞子句壓縮(個人感覺)...因為句中很明顯在比較minivans和sport utility vehicles,而carry as many as seven passengers只是用來形容minivans在和sport utility vehicles的相同情況下(同樣搭載7個人)...若是像A把這個情況變成一種動作,不免感覺就失去那個味道了...(自己寫一寫感覺抽象了 :P )

[agk99]

同意樓上的分析